Often considered the best of the original Star Trek Movies, Wrath of Khan pretty much wrote the textbook about how to write a film that is
pretty much a retrospective. Other examples of this type of film would include
Live Free or Die Hard and Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.
For most fans and critics Star Trek 1 was no good. It was too high budget and
destroyed much of what fans had loved about the tv show. When one watches Star
Trek 2 there is no sign that there was ever a first one. The film picks up like
a continuation of the tv show except fifteen years later. What makes Trek 2
work is the fact that in many ways it feels more like an episode of star trek.
It brings back the major characters and even a major villain. This really works
in its favor. It also knows that it’s a movie and it makes sure to let the
bigger canvas work to its benefit instead of hurting its story. The story of
dealing with old age was virtually ripped off in Indiana Jones 4. No joke there
are way too many similarities for this to be a coincidence. But don’t worry
Trek 2 is better than indy 4 mainly because it has much stronger scripting anda
way better villain. Khan is menacing and although he doesn’t get too much
screen time he makes the most of it. The acting here is pretty good all around
and the philosophical quality of the script makes it smarter than your normal
space opera. Unfortunately one thing really hurts Star Trek 2, it hasn’t aged
well. When watching this film you know you’re watching an ‘80’s scifi flick
from the hair to the costumes and the sets. The technology looks old and the
effects are definitely showing their age. The script too is sometimes way over
the top but in the end this is a fun ride that really continues the original
show well and with good taste 3.5/5
No comments:
Post a Comment